Marx & Nietzsche

Marx and NietzscheIn these paragraphs Marx takes into consideration the first `illusion of German Ideology and questions it ruggedness . German philosophical system based its exposit around kind cognizance on idealism w hereas Marx develops it from the material globe of e maneuverhly concern . He says that `[t]he exposit from which we begin atomic number 18 not capricious ones , not dogmas , however real(a) premises (Marx ,. 311 , these premises be based on the real individuals , their activity and the material conditions downstairs which they live (p . 311 ) whereas German premises does not breedate from cle ment existence but is a product of mental dress . Marxian method is historical materialism but it does not fee-tail that it is not based on premises but remote German premises , it is based on real br ead and butter . So Marx says `In beam contrast to German philosophy which descends from enlightenment to earth , here we ascend from earth to heaven . That is to say , we do not set out from what men say , imagine , regard , nor from men as narrated , mind of , imagined , conceived , in to arrive at men in the pattern . We set out from real , active men , and on the basis of their real invigoration-process we march the development of the ideological reflexes and echoes of this life-process (Marx ,. 315Marx is of the imagine that primarily human beingnesss are productive as they must(prenominal) develop a system of drudgery to comply with their way of life of subsistence and only hence they after part satisfy their material demand . This necessity generates a mountain range reaction i .e . new needs and new yield And these productive forces and processes develop the societal existence of human being . So it is the material life that determines the amicable life of adult male . So materialism directs the so! cial and hence the human consciousness . Consciousness is , therefore , from the real beginning a social product , and remains so as long as men exist at all (Marx ,br 317According to Nietzsche , classical tragedy was evolved from the traditional chorus that was innovative and original drama evolved from Greek ritualism .---Nietzsche refutes Aristotelian possibleness pertaining to origin of Greek tragedy and rests his premises on the theory of Schiller Schiller theory is of the view that chorus is a living wall that has enveloped the Greek tragedy in to eliminate itself from the real world and its realities . And consequently it has retained its poetic indecorum and saved itself from naturalism The forest god , as the Dionysian chorist lives in a religiously hold reality nether the sanction of myth and cult (Nietzsche ,. 322 ) chorus line , an ikon of myth and cult of religions becomes the basic of Greek Tragedy in opposition to naturalism prevailing in the contemporan eous expert world . The tragedy chorus replicates this natural item in an artistic wayNietzsche illustrates that tragedy as an art framing is expensive for humanity . In contrast to Schopenhauer , Nietzsche demonstrates that tragedy as the art form of corporeal recognition and approval of ruth and miseries of life and exulting in these harsh realities adoration...If you want to personate a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay